Trade links between the UK and China are very important. Why? Because China is emerging as the superpower and economic giant of the 21st century whilst the United States is in deep financial difficulties.
The Chinese market is huge. EU countries are falling over themselves to make deals with China.
The BBC today announced:
Mr Li, tipped to become China’s next premier, has also been pressing to get EU trade bans against China lifted.
The EU has an arms embargo in place that limits high-technology sales to China which could have a dual military use.
…
Elsewhere, BP and the China National Offshore Oil Corp signed a deal on deep-water exploration in the South China Sea, while Jaguar Land Rover committed to sell 40,000 vehicles in China in 2011.
Agreement has also been reached to bring two giant pandas to Edinburgh Zoo, the first to live in the UK for 17 years.
Now hang on. Remember Tibet. Remember the destruction of Tibetan culture and the suppression of its religious and cultural heritage. Remember that Tibet is being swamped with Chinese and that the ethnic and cultural heritage of Tibet is being destroyed. remember that Tibet is more or less closed to the outside world.
The two men had not shirked from discussing “difficult” issues such as human rights, Mr Clegg added, acknowledging that “persistent differences” remained between the countries.
Hmm, Yes. This is the soft pedal approach. Heaven forfend we offend the Chinese by being too heavy-handed. Widening cultural and trade links will hasten democracy. And Edinburgh zoo gets a breeding pair of Giant Pandas into the bargain.
Personally, I see this as realpolitik. I don’t actually blame the UK government for doing this. Maybe this approach will work.
Now look at Cameron on Israel in Turkey last year which I wrote about last year here.
“Humanitarian goods and people must flow in both directions. Gaza can not and must not be allowed to remain a prison camp,” he said.
Cameron has no problem dissing Israel to an Islamist regime. Cameron has no problem with saying:
I have. Unlike a lot of politicians from Britain who visit Israel, when I went, I did stand in occupied East Jerusalem and actually referred to it as occupied East Jerusalem. The Foreign Office bod who was with me said, most ministers don’t dare say. So, yes, I thought I had quite an argument when I was in Israel with Tzipi Livni about settlements and I think Obama is right to take a robust line. I think we have to but it is depressing how little progress is being made right now.
Yet he is so mealy-mouthed about China.
The sad fact is that foreign policy is not about truth or principles, it’s about getting what is best for your country, for the UK. It’s about being liked by the nice Americans. It’s about showing how important and influential the UK is.
Israel is dispensable. Israel is an easy target. The UK has little to lose by calling East Jerusalem ‘occupied’ whilst ignoring Tibet’s repression and loss of autonomy within China.
I’d like to see Cameron in Taipei criticising China’s Tibet policy. I’d like even more for Cameron to go and stand in Lhasa.
In 2008, the Dalai Lama criticised the then Labour government for not speaking out against a “cultural genocide”. (See TimesOnline here.)
Mr Brown has been accused of kowtowing to Beijing by refusing to invite the Dalai Lama to Downing Street for formal talks. Instead he will meet the spiritual leader at Lambeth Palace on Friday enabling the Prime Minister to claim that he is receiving the 72-year-old monk in a spiritual rather than political capacity
Successive governments have tip-toed around the Tibet issue so as not to offend almighty, rich, big-spending China.
But Israel gets the big stick. It’s small, not as powerful as you have been led to believe, it doesn’t spend big in the EU, it cannot harm anyone’s economy.
Yet how many academic, trade union, student or cultural boycotts or calls for such have you seen lately?
Maybe we could say that the UK government is panda-ing to the Chinese